NAPFA

An Update on Fiduciary

11746719224_25675af5b1_z.jpg

The Financial Planning Association’s (FPA) National Conference last weekend could have been presented by “The F-Word”: Fiduciary. The weekend brought together 2,000 CFP® professionals, all of whom adhere to the fiduciary standard. This is the standard of care, which requires that financial professionals to put the interests of clients first. (Those financial professionals with the CFP® certification from the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards (CFP) are fiduciaries, as are CPA Personal Financial Specialists, members of the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors (NAPFA), as well as 17,000 of the 24,000 members of the FPA. That principal might seem obvious to consumers. Of course someone who is talking to me about my financial life should put my interest before his or his company’s interest, right? That’s why according to a recent survey conducted by the CFP, 9 out of 10 Americans agree that when they receive financial guidance, the person providing the advice should put the consumers’ interests ahead of theirs and should have to tell consumers up front about any conflicts of interest that could potentially influence that advice.

Unfortunately, while many consumers are increasingly turning to professionals to help guide them (40 percent of respondents, up 12 percent from five years ago), many of these individuals are working with folks who are not required to put the interest of clients first.

This survey was conducted as a quiet battle is going in Washington DC. Earlier in the year, President Obama endorsed a Department of Labor proposal, which would require all financial professionals to act in a customer’s best interest when working with retirement investors. The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, the lobbying arm of the financial world, said “This proposal would lead to a number of negative consequences for individual investors.” A number of large firms that provide retirement services echo the SIFMA sentiment and have submitted alternative proposals to DOL.

The Financial Planning Coalition, which is comprised of the CFP Board, the FPA and NAPFA support the fiduciary rule and note that the change “is a long overdue and much-needed update to the 40 year-old definition of ‘fiduciary’ under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).” The coalition dismisses alternative proposals from financial services organizations and firms, saying that they would dilute “the basic requirements of a true fiduciary standard under either ERISA or securities law.”

Paul Auslander, the former Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Financial Planning Association and Director of Financial Planning at ProVise Management Group, LLC, told me that considering that most consumers believe that they are receiving untainted financial advice, the rules should be updated to do so.

“It’s no wonder that consumers are confused,” says Auslander: “Many professionals call themselves ‘advisOrs,’ but only those who are registered under the Investment Adviser Act of 1940 are ‘advisErs’.” Notice the spelling: Financial advisors (with an “o”) “tend to be titles for salespeople in financial services, while those who are advisers (with an “E”), are likely to follow the fiduciary standard”.

As a veteran of the industry, I asked Auslander why some companies are pushing back so hard against the change. He believes that there is a unique business opportunity that these fearful firms are missing. “The company that has the professional guts to be the first to plant the flagpole on top of the fiduciary mountain will be richly rewarded by consumers, who will flock to the early adopters of a true, legally-binding client-first model. It's mind boggling to me how few senior executives get this.” And for those financial professionals who are resistant, Auslander reminds them “Doing the right thing is a huge differentiator, and being legally obligated to be accountable for your company's actions is the only way to do it.”

To find a fiduciary adviser, you can use the Financial Planning Association's tool, the CFP Board's search engine or for fee-only advice (those who do not take any commission), you can go to NAPFA.

Should You Use a Robo Advisor?

4035860385_ac2bcb830a_z.jpg

“Robo advisors are going to kill the brokerage business,” carped a financial consultant from one of the big wire houses. That’s an overstatement, but financial professionals and brokers who have mostly been selling investments and not providing financial advice may find that software and algorithms could eventually make them obsolete. The advent of new technology has put some of these old school pros on their heels, as investors – especially younger ones – find the process of answering risk tolerance questions on line and utilizing computer generated asset allocation plans preferable to face-to-face meetings with various salespeople, who are hocking the product du jour.

Over the past twenty years or so, traditional brokers and advisors have slowly but surely jacked up fees for smaller accounts. It’s not hard to understand why they would do so. Many branch managers tell their staff something along the lines of “it takes the same amount of time and energy to work with a $200,000 client as a $1,000,000 one, so stop spinning your wheels with the small fries!”

The way that large firms stomach working with smaller clients is to either hike their fees (two percent or more for assets under $250,000) or to keep selling high cost, commission-based mutual funds or insurance products. Unfortunately, for those who were not do it yourselfers, there weren’t many other alternatives, that is, until the advent of the robo advisor.

The process is easy: log on to one of the robo advisor platforms like Wealthfront or Betterment, and you will be asked to complete an online questionnaire, which takes into account some of your general financial goals and objectives and your risk tolerance. Based on your responses, the robo advisor’s proprietary algorithm will slot you into the most appropriate portfolio. The firms usually use exchange-traded funds, provide rebalancing, reinvest dividends, and in some cases, can harvest tax losses.

Mutual fund and discount brokerage firms like Vanguard, Fidelity, Charles Schwab, TD Ameritrade and E*Trade have similar variations on the theme. The fees range from 0.25 to 0.75 percent of assets plus fund expenses and most services require an investment minimum.

In some cases, these firms will also provide financial advice, but a bit of caution: it is tough to create a computer model that understands who you are and can listen carefully to address your financial needs. If you have significant assets, a complicated financial life or need some extra hand holding, you may want to eschew the robo advisor route and pay up for a human being, who can provide you with customized, one-on-one advice.

As I have advocated in this space, if you do choose to work with a financial planner, please be sure that he or she is bound by the fiduciary standard. A fiduciary duty means that a financial professional must put your needs first. (CFP® professionals and Certified Public Accountant Personal Financial Specialists (PFS) are both held to the fiduciary duty.) Those who aren’t fiduciaries are held to a lesser standard, called “suitability,” which means that anything they sell you has to be appropriate for you, though not necessarily in your best interest. The SEC has noted, “most [investors] are unaware of the different legal standards that apply to their advice and recommendations…and expect that the recommendations they receive will be in their best interests.”

Here are three resources to find fiduciary advisors:

As robo advisors mature, the choice may not be black and white. In fact, some financial planning and investment management firms are using the new technological platforms to reintroduce their services to smaller clients. This hybrid solution may provide the best of both worlds for those investors who want to keep fees down, but also need financial advice from time to time.

#213 Annuity Haters

JSminibrand1.png

Guest Gary Schatsky, a fee-only financial advisor, Chair Emeritus of NAPFA and Annuity Hater, joins the show to discuss why annuities are rarely advisable (Gary says just 5 percent of the time!) He also weighs in on the concept of fiduciary and explains why he believes that working with a fee-only advisor vastly reduces the potential for conflicts of interest.

  • Download the podcast on iTunes
  • Download the podcast on feedburner
  • Download this week's show (MP3)

Kenny from NY read my recent post, "Spring Cleaning for your Money" and wanted to know how to reduce the taxable income generated from some of his mutual funds. One easy fix: use index funds in taxable accounts and keep managed funds in retirement accounts.

Meanwhile, Terry from MN is sitting pretty in her early retirement, but is not sure whether she should roll over her old 401 (k) into an IRA; and she also needs allocation tips. Poor Michael was unable to max out his retirement contributions and now is starting a fatter tax bill, while Steve asked about beneficiary IRA accounts and Wayne asked for advice about changing careers - from a pilot to a financial planner.

Thanks to everyone who participated and to Mark, the BEST producer in the world. If you have a financial question, there are lots of ways to contact us:

  • Call 855-411-JILL and we'll schedule time to get you on the show LIVE 

Obama Endorses Fiduciary Standard for Retirement Accounts

11746719224_25675af5b1_z.jpg

The White House wants to change the way brokers provide advice on retirement accounts. President Obama endorsed a Department of Labor proposal, which would require brokers to act in a customer’s best interest—the so-called FIDUCIARY duty—when working with retirement investors. The rule change is intended to crack down on “backdoor payments and hidden fees,” which cost retirement savers $8 - $17 billion a year, according to Jason Furman, chairman of Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers. As you might expect, the financial services industry is not happy about the potential shift. The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association says "This proposal would lead to a number of negative consequences for individual investors."

I know what you're thinking: How could a rule that puts my interests first, be bad? Well, according to the SEC, the idea that the industry is plagued by conflicts of interest, "has nowhere been proven," and would effectively overhaul the entire regulatory regime, ignoring "eight decades of securities laws and regulations.  The real kicker, however, is that this is not a Commission rulemaking." This is a not-so-subtle shot at the Department of Labor, which in issuing this rule change, is stomping on SEC territory. Nothing like an inter-departmental catfight!

In fact, SEC Commissioner Daniel Gallagher thinks that it is "curious" that the DOL didn't consult with the SEC, especially given that the SEC maintains comprehensive oversight authority with respect to the investment advisers and broker-dealers who would be impacted by the change. Gallagher underscores that the DOL ignores SEC rules, which already address underlying conflicts of interest. But here's the nut of the problem, according to the SEC:  there is no evidence that the industry is plagued by conflicts of interest and the new rules could limit investor access to qualified investment advice and investment products.

The proposal will likely be put out for public comment for several months, so for those who need a refresher on investment professionals and their designations, here are some terms to consider:

Investment advisorIf the advisor is registered as an IA, he or she owes you a fiduciary duty, which is a fancy way of saying that she must put your needs first. Investment professionals who aren't fiduciaries are held to a lesser standard, called “suitability,” which means that anything they sell you has to be appropriate for you, though not necessarily in your best interest.

CFP® certification: The Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards (CFP Board) requires candidates to meet what it calls “the four Es”: Education (Education (through one of several approved methods, must demonstrate the ability to create, deliver and monitor a comprehensive financial plan, covering investment, insurance, estate, retirement, education and ethics), Examination (a 10-hour exam given over a day and a half), Experience (three years of full-time, relevant personal financial planning experience required) and Ethics (disclosure of any criminal, civil, governmental, or self-regulatory agency proceeding or inquiry). CFPs must adhere to the fiduciary standard.

CPA Personal Financial Specialist (PFS): The American Institute of CPAs® offers a separate financial planning designation. In addition to already being a licensed CPA, a CPA/PFS candidate must earn a minimum of 75 hours of personal financial planning education and have two years of full-time business or teaching experience (or 3,000 hours equivalent) in personal financial planning, all within the five year period preceding the date of the PFS application. They must also pass an approved Personal Financial Planner exam.

Membership in the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors (NAPFA): NAPFA professionals must be RIAs and must also have either the CFP or CPA-PFS designation. Additionally, NAPFA advisers are fee-only, which means that they do not accept commissions or any additional fees from outside sources for the recommendations they make. In addition to being fee-only, NAPFA advisers must provide information on their background, experience, education and credentials, and are required to submit a financial plan to a peer review. After acceptance into NAPFA, members must fulfill continuing education requirements.

If you are interested in finding a financial advisor, here are some resources:

Protect Against Scams: 10 Questions to Ask Financial Advisors

2046188221_dbd7640faf_z-1.jpg

SCAM ALERT! The North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) have both issued annual reports identifying the top threats investors are likely to face in 2015. The lists are lengthy, but a couple of new, noteworthy threats you should guard against include:  Pot Schemes: Legalization of marijuana has encouraged promoters to market and sell investments in this emerging and fast-growing industry, and securities regulators are seeing “pump and dump” scams. "Fraudsters lure investors with aggressive, optimistic, and potentially false or misleading information designed to create unwarranted demand for shares of a small, thinly traded company with little or no history of financial success (the “pump”). Once share prices and volumes peak, scammers behind the ploy sell their shares at a profit, leaving investors with worthless stock (the “dump”)." One more note: Even legitimate companies promoting a new venture in a new field are highly speculative and carry a high degree of risk for investors. 

BitCoin Bites: Another area of concern is for securities offerings tied to digital currencies, where unscrupulous promoters are often illegally offering securities tied to these currencies.

Some of the old problems for investors remain in 2015. Here are just some of the issues that are on FINRA's radar screen:

Customer Comes Last: FINRA says that too many firms and their representatives are not putting customers’ interests first.

Variable Annuity Ambiguity: Regulators are focusing on sales practice issues associated with variable annuities, because many consumers purchase these contracts without fully understanding the steep fees involved.

Senior Investors: The U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging estimates that older Americans lose $2.9 billion to fraud each year. In fact, there is so much targeting of older Americans, that the Committee launched a special fraud hotline to help deal with the "epidemic" and has held a series of investigations to spotlight the devastating impact fraud has on seniors.

Separately, FINRA examiners continue to review communications with seniors; the suitability of investment recommendations made to seniors; and the techniques used to attract senior investors. Additionally, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau provides resources for families trying to ward off the senior scammers.

If all of these frauds has you spooked, GOOD! That means that you are ready to start asking the right questions of financial professionals. Once again, here are my favorite ten questions to ask any potential financial advisor, stock broker or insurance salesperson before you retain them:

1) Are you registered as an investment advisor? If yes, then the advisor owes you a fiduciary duty, which is a fancy way of saying that she must put your needs first. Investment professionals who aren't fiduciaries are held to a lesser standard, called “suitability,” which means that anything they sell you has to be appropriate for you, though not necessarily in your best interest.

2) How will I pay for your services? The advisor should clearly state in writing how she will be paid for the services provided. The three basic methods of payment are: fees based on an hourly or flat rate; fees based on a percentage of your portfolio value, often called "Assets Under Management" ("AUM"); and commissions paid per transaction. How often you expect to trade, and whether you want your money pro-actively managed, will help determine which model works best for you.

3) What experience do you have? Find out how long the advisor has been in practice and where. Also ask if she has any professional certifications, licenses or designations. While these are signals of credibility, they don't guarantee a successful relationship. Here’s a description of some of the more common financial planner designations:

  • CFP® certification: The Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards (CFP Board) requires candidates to meet what it calls “the four Es”: Education (Education (through one of several approved methods, must demonstrate the ability to create, deliver and monitor a comprehensive financial plan, covering investment, insurance, estate, retirement, education and ethics), Examination (a 10-hour exam given over a day and a half; most recent exam pass rate was 62.6 percent), Experience (three years of full-time, relevant personal financial planning experience required) and Ethics (disclosure of any criminal, civil, governmental, or self-regulatory agency proceeding or inquiry). CFPs must adhere to the fiduciary standard.
  • CPA Personal Financial Specialist (PFS): The American Institute of CPAs® offers a separate financial planning designation. In addition to already being a licensed CPA, a CPA/PFS candidate must earn a minimum of 75 hours of personal financial planning education and have two years of full-time business or teaching experience (or 3,000 hours equivalent) in personal financial planning, all within the five year period preceding the date of the PFS application. They must also pass an approved Personal Financial Planner exam.
  • Membership in the Membership in the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors (NAPFA): NAPFA maintains a high bar for entry: Professionals must be RIAs and must also have either the CFP or CPA-PFS designation. Additionally, NAPFA advisers are fee-only, which means that they do not accept commissions or any additional fees from outside sources for the recommendations they make. In addition to being fee-only, NAPFA advisers must provide information on their background, experience, education and credentials, and are required to submit a financial plan to a peer review. After acceptance into NAPFA, members must fulfill continuing education requirements. The stiff requirements make NAPFA members among the tiniest percentage of registered investment advisers, with only 2,400 total current members.

4) What services do you offer? The services offered can depend on a number of factors including credentials, licenses and areas of expertise. Some offer advice on a range of topics, but do not sell financial products. Others may provide advice only in specific areas such as estate planning or tax matters.

5) What is your approach to financial planning and investing? Some advisors prefer to develop a holistic plan that brings together all of your financial goals. Others provide advice on specific areas, as needed. Make sure the advisor’s viewpoint on investing is neither too cautious nor overly aggressive for your risk tolerance. Also ask whether the planner makes investment decisions herself, or depends on others in the firm to do so. What was the advisor's performance in both good and bad markets and ask yourself whether it’s more important to you to make money in a rising market or prevent losses in a down market. A great follow up question: what were the three worst investment decisions you made over the past five years, and how did you correct them?

6) Can you provide three references? Ask for two current clients whose goals and finances match your own, as well as a professional reference, like an accountant or estate attorney.

7) Do you have a financial interest in the entity that houses my account? This is your Madoff-prevention question. When interviewing advisors not associated with large brokerage or insurance companies, ask if they use an independent, third party custodian or clearing firm (this is the entity that produces your statements), which prevents the advisor from having direct custody of your assets and adds another level of security for your account. In the Madoff example, he was the investment advisor, broker-dealer, clearing agent and custodian for all of his client accounts.

8) Is there anything in your regulatory record that I should know about? Part of your research should include conducting background checks on the professional you may hire. You can visit the Securities & Exchange Commission and FINRA websites or the State Securities website NASAA as well as the CFP Board. While some violations are non-starters (settlement of multiple customer complaints) others may be understandable (marketing materials not pre-approved; non-client or investment violations).

9) How often will we interact? What should you expect in terms of frequency of verbal, written and in-person communication? Also ask whether the advisor will remain your primary contact.

10) Do I like this person? You are about to enter into an intimate relationship that will hopefully last a long time. If you have any reservations, move on. There are plenty of qualified advisors out there, who would like to help you out.

Financial Thanksgiving 2014

6301771732_8840fd2929_z.jpg

Thanksgiving is a time when we can give thanks for all of the blessings in our lives, like health, loving spouse, a wonderful family and amazing friends. But this is a money column, so this week, I would also like to give thanks to all of the amazing people and resources that have improved our financial lives. The Financial Planning Coalition: The collaboration of the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards (“CFP Board”), the Financial Planning Association® (“FPA”), and the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors (“NAPFA”) continues to work on behalf of consumers to make the fiduciary standard the gold standard for financial advice-givers.

The Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI)The mission of EBRI is to contribute to, to encourage, and to enhance the development of sound employee benefit programs and sound public policy through objective research and education. EBRI has also developed an easy to use retirement calculator, which I wholeheartedly endorse.

Life Happens: While I have been a critic of some of the practices of the insurance industry, this nonprofit, founded by seven producer organizations, is dedicated to helping Americans take personal financial responsibility through the ownership of life insurance and related products, including disability and long-term care insurance. Of particular interest is the Life Happens Insurance calculator.

Mark Kantrowitz/FinAid.org: Mark created this terrific web site for education funding in the fall of 1994 as a public service. It is the quintessential resource for every would-be college student, providing informative, objective and valuable advice for students and their families, who are looking for ways to finance their education.

SSA.gov: I know that everyone complains about the Social Security system, but the government’s web site is a great tool. You can manage your account online and use the estimator to determine your future benefit.

Jack Bogle: When he was a junior at Princeton University in 1949, Jack Bogle decided to use the concept of index funds as the topic of his senior thesis. That decision eventually led to the creation of the modern index fund. In 1976, The Vanguard Group – then a new mutual fund company – rolled out the First Index Investment Trust, which ultimately became the Vanguard 500 Index Fund. The fund, which was originally referred to as “Bogle's Folly” has become the single best friend to retail investors.

AnnualCreditReport.com: In the aftermath of the credit boom and bust, there were singing pirates and a myriad of online offers to help consumers take control of their credit histories, but there was only one official site, guaranteed by Federal law, where you can obtain a free credit report annually.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB): The CFPB was created out of 2010’s Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The CFPB consolidated most Federal consumer financial protection authority in one place and focuses on one goal: watching out for American consumers in the market for consumer financial products and services. Although various regulators had consumer divisions, none has the sole focus of keep an eye out for us. The CFPB works to give consumers the information they need to understand the terms of their agreements with financial companies. They are working to make regulations and guidance as clear and streamlined as possible so providers of consumer financial products and services can follow the rules on their own.

Ann Marsh: Since we have just celebrated Veterans’ Day, I would like to highlight the work of Financial Planning Magazine’s Senior Editor and West Coast Bureau Chief. Ann’s phenomenal work highlighted how financial problems are weighing on our servicemen and servicewomen, and in some cases, contributing to suicide. Please read her article and if you are interested in supporting our veterans, please check out www.giveanhour.org, which is in the process of considering launching a financial planning arm of its services and www.psycharmor.org, which is putting together a new network of private sector professionals to help soldiers and vets, including financial planners.

Investors are “Confused and Harmed”

7658298768-e4c2c2635e-z.jpg

Pity the poor consumer of financial services. According to The Financial Planning Coalition, a collaboration of the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards (“CFP Board”), the Financial Planning Association® (“FPA”), and the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors (“NAPFA”), “consumers who want financial planning services are…unable to differentiate those who are truly competent to provide financial planning services from those who are using financial planning as a marketing tool.” The Coalition recently released a white paper, “Consumers Are Confused and Harmed,” which highlighted the problem. I know that you too will be shocked, just shocked to learn that the misunderstanding is not solely our fault…it has something to do with the fact that some financial service providers “are contributing to the confusion in the marketplace by identifying themselves as financial planners but not providing financial planning services.”

The Coalition points to a Cerulli study, which found that over 166,000 financial advisors self-identified as members of a financial planning focused practice, but after conducting detailed analysis, Cerulli “determined that only 38 percent of the self-identified financial planners actually had financial planning focused practices. In other words, over 100,000 financial advisors incorrectly self-identified as being part of a financial planning practice.”

Let’s think about this in another way. Let’s say that you go to the doctor to have a knee replacement and the doctor identifies himself as someone who does orthopedic surgery. Upon further analysis, you find out that the guy is a primary care physician and not a surgeon. You sure would have liked to know that fact, before you went under the knife, right?

According to Kevin Keller, the CEO of the CFP Board “American consumers looking for financial planning services face an uphill battle when it comes to identifying a competent, ethical financial planner. Just as consumers expect a medical doctor to have an M.D., a lawyer – a J.D., an accountant – a CPA, they should expect their financial planner to demonstrate expertise, experience, and accountability, and be held to standards the public can understand and trust.”

Here’s the problem: there is NO uniform regulation of financial planners, which would ensure that our expectations are met. In 2011, the SEC’s “Study on investment advisers and broker-dealers advocated that the “fiduciary standard” be applied to the industry. A fiduciary duty means that a financial professional must put your needs first. (CFP® professionals are held to the fiduciary duty.) Those who aren’t fiduciaries are held to a lesser standard, called “suitability,” which means that anything they sell you has to be appropriate for you, though not necessarily in your best interest. The SEC has noted, “most [investors] are unaware of the different legal standards that apply to their advice and recommendations…and expect that the recommendations they receive will be in their best interests.”

The coalition’s white paper corroborates the SEC: “A full 82 percent of consumers believe that a financial planner is essentially the same as a financial advisor, and there is only slightly less confusion between the titles financial planner, wealth manager and investment advisor.” And the vast majority of those who are held to the suitability standard would like to keep you mired in confusion. That’s why SIFMA, the industry’s lobbying arm, has spent millions of dollars to prevent the fiduciary standard from becoming law.

Lauren M. Schadle, CEO/Executive Director of FPA cuts to the chase: “It’s really pretty simple. Consumers who seek integrated, financial planning and receive narrow advice or one-product solutions with their life savings are harmed by the lack of appropriate regulation…time and time again, consumers are misled and harmed by those who simply use the moniker ‘financial planner’ as a marketing tactic but fail to deliver actual financial planning.” NAPFA CEO Geof Brown adds that the current environment can lead consumers to purchase “investment or insurance products that are inappropriate for them.”

What’s the fix? Until the government adopts the fiduciary standard, your best bet is to come right out and ask any potential or current financial professional, “Are you a fiduciary?” If not, you may want to find someone who is.

Here are three resources to find fiduciary advisors:

#189 Democratizing Investing with Mitch Tuchman

JSminibrand1.png

After a volatile period in the markets, it's time to focus on things you CAN control, like the expenses you pay for investment management. MarketRiders.com and ReBalance-IRA.com founder Mitch Tuchman joins us to explain why now is a great time to seek affordable investment advice.

  • Download the podcast on iTunes
  • Download the podcast on feedburner
  • Download this week's show (MP3)

Mitch says that fees are eating away at your bottom line, which is why he launched MarketRiders.com for do it yourselfers and Rebalance-IRA.com for those who want to outsource their management. And here's a stunning a fact: a recent ReBalance-IRA study found that half of the people surveyed think that they are paying ZERO in fees. If you are seeking investment advice, here are 10 Questions to Ask Before Hiring an Advisor.

Marcia from Maryland asked about collecting Social Security benefits from an ex-spouse, David from Texas wants to know whether he should he use extra cash flow to fund a Roth and separately, what's the best college funding vehicle? Jo from Louisville wants to know whether investment advisory fees are worth it and Sharon wrote in about my recent segment on CBS This Morning about “Women and Money”.

Thanks to everyone who participated and to Mark, the BEST producer in the world. Check out Mark's first-producing credit for this CBS Evening News segment that aired recently. If you have a financial question, there are lots of ways to contact us:

  • Call 855-411-JILL and we'll schedule time to get you on the show LIVE 

#188 How to Land a Job for You and Your Kids

JSminibrand1.png

It's parents' weekend at many colleges all over the country, a perfect time for career expert, Sheila Curran of The Curran Consulting Group (CCG) to join us for a guest appearance. Sheila has spent a chunk of her career running college career service centers and is now a consultant who helps would-be job seekers of all ages to understand how to better position themselves to land a plum gig.

  • Download the podcast on iTunes
  • Download the podcast on feedburner
  • Download this week's show (MP3)

What should young scholars be doing to prepare for the new cut-throat career world, where there is little loyalty and only a few formal training programs? Sheila says it is no longer about classroom learning-students should be interning as a means to try out different career tracks. She also advises that young interviewees do their homework before the interview. For mid-career professionals, who seek change, she advises to self-examination and to think like an employer!

Calls this week from Scott from Boston, Carol from RI, Debbie and Warren were heavily tilted towards retirement, while Mark from KY wanted to know what a self-described stock-market-a-phobe should do with an account that has ballooned in value?

Chris from MD asked how he might be able to determine whether his advisor is acting in your best interest? This allowed me to talk about the F-Word: FIDUCIARY! Check out: PlannerSearch.Org

No-Name, a recently retired with $185K in cash is seeking a “fairly safe” investment…ah, the age old question of risk vs. reward! And Chris from Melville, NY wrote in recommending that I discuss bond/CD ladders and Janice asked what would happen if a big custodian were to fail?

Here's last week's segment from CBS This Morning, where I discussed how to navigate benefits enrollment.

Thanks to everyone who participated and to Mark, the BEST producer in the world. Check out Mark's first-producing credit for this CBS Evening News segment that aired recently. If you have a financial question, there are lots of ways to contact us:

  • Call 855-411-JILL and we'll schedule time to get you on the show LIVE 

#176 Managing Money: As Easy as Brushing and Flossing

JSminibrand1.png

Why does the financial services industry have to complicate our lives? The good news is that once we get you set, managing your money should be as easy as brushing and flossing, perhaps helped by a couple of trips to the dentists each year. While there are so many ways to simplify your financial life, sometimes the industry really does make it hard.

  • Download the podcast on iTunes
  • Download the podcast on feedburner
  • Download this week's show (MP3)

Lori's call about being sold two variable annuities is a case in point and allowed me to discuss the concept of  fiduciary standard, which requires financial professionals to act in the best interests of their clients. You may think that any broker or insurance agent is obligated to do so, but they are generally held to a much looser standard, called “suitability.” In other words, the product or advice they are providing needs only to be suitable for you, rather than in your best interests. The sale of variable annuities to Lori may have been "suitable", but it was most certainly not in her best interest. 

Not surprisingly, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA), the trade association that lobbies on behalf of the financial services industry, has opposed imposing regulation that would be too strict, because it would “limit consumer choice”. The more cynical will note that the fiduciary standard would put a big dent into commissions generated by firms and their salespeople, especially those who recommend fee-rich products inside rollover accounts. Sadly, the industry lobbyists have spent oodles of money and as a result, the fiduciary standard, which should have been adopted in the aftermath of the financial crisis, is now on hold until 2016 at the earliest.

Also on the show, some 529 info for Mark's sister; a long-term care insurance review; and advice on how to invest a lump sum that must remain liquid.

Thanks to everyone who participated and to Mark, the BEST producer in the world. Check out Mark's first-producing credit for this CBS Evening News segment that aired recently. If you have a financial question, there are lots of ways to contact us:

  • Call 855-411-JILL and we'll schedule time to get you on the show LIVE