Financial advisors

Radio Show #113: Kentucky Derby, Roth IRA

JSminibrand1.png

It’s Derby weekend on the show—we have no idea which horse will win, but we can make one great bet: keep those expenses down with index funds and you are sure to see a bigger pay-off!

  • Download the podcast on iTunes
  • Download the podcast on feedburner
  • Download this week's show (MP3)

Dick and Jim each had questions about paying for financial advice. As I have said, while many people have the time, expertise and temperament to manage their own money, many others do not. To explore fee-only advisors, who have to put your needs first and do not collect any commissions, go to NAPFA.org.

Retirement and allocation questions from John, Phillip, Mary and Jim were opportunities to review some good rules of thumb: keep company stock allocation to 5 to 10 percent of the total portfolio value; maintain an adequate emergency reserve fund (at least 12 months of living expenses); whether I-Bonds make sense as a hedge against future inflation; and how to calculate consistent retirement income (multiply total portfolio value at retirement by 3.5 percent).

Sonya’s question about a Roth IRA conversation led to a discussion of IRS Rule 72-T. This rule allows IRA owners to avoid the early withdrawal penalties if: (1) Distributions are established as substantially equal periodic payments; (2) the payment schedule is continued for five years or until the account owner reaches age 59½, whichever is longer; and (3) the withdrawal amount is calculated using one of three IRS-approved life expectancy determination methods (life expectancy, annuity, amortization). You can check out this 72-T calculator from Bankrate.com.

How can you access money from a variable annuity? Listen to my conversation with Rosie and you can learn how!

Thanks to everyone who participated and to Mark, the BEST producer in the world. If you have a financial question, there are lots of ways to contact us:

  • Call 855-411-JILL and we'll schedule time to get you on the show LIVE 

Radio Show #112: Is your financial advisor worth his fees?

JSminibrand1.png

Do you need a financial advisor? Do you have one and can't determine whether it's worth the money? We tackle these questions and more on this week's show.

  • Download the podcast on iTunes
  • Download the podcast on feedburner
  • Download this week's show (MP3)

Joe started the show with a great question: should he take a lump sum from his employer’s retirement plan or would he be better off receiving a monthly pension payment. There are lots of variables to consider in making this decision, so pay attention.

Dorothy and Sandi both have advisors, who are recommending an investment that is generating a fat yield. Gang when we are living in a zero interest world, any investment that is delivering outsized interest has risk—real risk!

Laura and Dick are each pondering how to evaluate their investment advisors. For some, it is well worth the money to work with a professional who will guide them. The trick is to make sure that you understand what the fees cover and whether or not it’s worth it for you. Check out NAPFA.org to find a fee-only advisor who will put your interests first!

An hourly advisor may be especially useful, when it comes to planning for aging loved one. Phil is trying to evaluate the options for his 85 year-old relative, which is in a nursing home.

Where should you put extra money? In Eric’s case, slap it down on a 6 percent student loan; for Bob answer is buying dividend paying mutual or exchange-traded fund; while Mary-Lisa needs to establish an emergency reserve fund.

Our 20-somethings are inspiring, because they are socking money away like nobody’s business. Ming is ready to start contributing to a 401 (k) – best to keep things simple, by using target date funds. Meanwhile, Myles wants to know how much money to put down on a new home purchase. He could plunk down half the purchase price and still have an emergency fund, but should he?

We round out the show with a few retirement plan questions from Eric, who is considering a purchase of commodities for his old 401 (k) (just say NO!); David, who needs to re-characterize an IRA; Terry, who wants to clarify the rules for beneficiaries of IRA accounts; and Liv, who wants to make sure her retirement plan is on track.

Thanks to everyone who participated and to Mark, the BEST producer in the world. If you have a financial question, there are lots of ways to contact us:

  • Call 855-411-JILL and we'll schedule time to get you on the show LIVE 

Alphabet soup of financial advice

Alphabet-Soup.jpg

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has honed in on an important question: What do the various “senior designation” titles that financial advisers use to market their services really mean? To answer, the CFPB recently delivered a report to Congress and the Securities and Exchange Commission, entitled “Senior Designations for Financial Advisers: Reducing Consumer Confusion and Risks”. There are more than 50 different senior designations used in the marketplace and while some do convey special training and experience in providing financial advice to seniors, others are a way to target older consumers and sell them “inappropriate and sometimes fraudulent financial products.” In the topsy-turvy world of advice, a salesman can call himself an “Accredited Retirement Advisor (ARA)” even though the CFPB reported that this designation is not accredited at all.

How can consumers sift though the designations? The CFPB admits that seniors have insufficient information to determine the legitimacy and value of different senior designations. To help consumers, the report recommends the creation of a centralized tool through which senior investors can verify a financial adviser’s designations; the establishment of a mechanism to capture complaints and enforcement actions against senior designation holders; and the requirement that senior advisers to disclose their qualifications and the meaning of the senior-specific certification.

Unfortunately, the CFPB did not weigh in on the elephant in the room: the fiduciary standard, a set of core principles that advisers can adhere to, most importantly a commitment to put the interests of their clients first. Consumers can eliminate many of the hucksters by only doing business with professionals who commit to the standard.

Because I receive so many questions about financial professional designations, I am once again repeating my favorites:

CFP® certification: The Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards (CFP Board) requires candidates to meet what it calls “the four Es”: Education (Education (through one of several approved methods, must demonstrate the ability to create, deliver and monitor a comprehensive financial plan, covering investment, insurance, estate, retirement, education and ethics), Examination (a 10-hour exam given over a day and a half; most recent exam pass rate was 62.6 percent), Experience (three years of full-time, relevant personal financial planning experience required) and Ethics (disclosure of any criminal, civil, governmental, or self-regulatory agency proceeding or inquiry). CFPs must adhere to the fiduciary standard.

CPA Personal Financial Specialist (PFS): The American Institute of CPAs® offers a separate financial planning designation. In addition to already being a licensed CPA, a CPA/PFS candidate must earn a minimum of 75 hours of personal financial planning education and have two years of full-time business or teaching experience (or 3,000 hours equivalent) in personal financial planning, all within the five year period preceding the date of the PFS application. They must also pass an approved Personal Financial Planner exam.

Membership in the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors (NAPFA): Becoming a member of NAPFA maintains a high bar for entry: Professionals must be RIAs and must also have either the CFP or CPA-PFS designation. Additionally, NAPFA advisers are fee-only, which means that they do not accept commissions or any additional fees from outside sources for the recommendations they make. Fee-only advisers can charge based on an hourly or flat rate, or based on a percentage of your portfolio value, often called “Assets Under Management” (AUM). Either method is fine with NAPFA; however, if the adviser collects a commission from an insurance company or a fee from a mutual fund company as part of the financial plan, then that adviser is precluded from membership.

In addition to being fee-only, NAPFA advisers must be fiduciaries and must provide information on their background, experience, education and credentials, and are required to submit a financial plan to a peer review. After acceptance into NAPFA, members must fulfill continuing education requirements. The requirements make NAPFA members among the tiniest percentage of registered investment advisers, with only 2,400 total current members.

It’s certainly possible to get good advice from an adviser without these designations, but they do help protect investors from some of the most egregious salespeople out there. No matter what, if you feel pressure from any financial professional, run the other way!

Distributed by Tribune Media Services, Inc.